Breakthrough Thinking from Inside the Box
by Kevin P. Coyne, Patricia Gorman Clifford, and Renée Dye
December 2007 | Harvard Business Review 71
After reading the article Breakthrough Thinking from Inside the Box in the Harvard Business Review, I’ve done a whole lot of thinking about innovation, and about human behavior. I was talking to my younger brother not too long ago, discussing how constraints and their accompanying frustration can be used to channel creativity and energy that would otherwise dissipate; and to find research and examples that support our theories about it feels nice, the way it feels nice to hit a nail clean in the head.
You see, according to the authors the question can you invent a new business in the next 20 minutes is so broad that no one can come up with a good answer to it. But ask how can we take something children love and reproduce it in an extreme, expensive form for adults? and you’re talking business in a Disney, Häagen-Dazs, Spider-man-ish way. Brainstorming in the traditional way, the authors continue, is less effective than it could be because there are either too few constraints or too many; people, lacking a way of evaluating the potential of their ideas, either go too far in a tangent or go nowhere. Market research in particular, is of little use when innovating because people find it hard to tell you if they want or need a product they have never seen or imagined (citing examples of Xerox, the Walkman, and the cell-phone which were all predicted to fail according to market research).
The right question
The key is in the questions you ask. The authors cite research from others, and their own, in stating that “…it didn’t matter whether [Nobel laureates] had actually asked a question or not. What mattered was whether there was a question that could have uncovered the kind of extraordinary opportunities that CNN, Google, USA Today, eBay, and Amazon identified and exploited.”
A few of the questions one could ask are
* Which customers use or purchase our product in the most unusual way?
* Who spends at least 50% of what our product costs to adapt it to their specific needs?
* Who uses our product in ways we never expected or intended?
* What is the biggest hassle of purchasing or using our product?
* For which current customers ir our product least suited?
* Which customers does the industry prefer not to serve, and why?
* What information about customers and product use is created as a by-product of our business that could be the key to radically improving the economics of another business?
* Which customers’ needs are shifting most rapidly? What will they be in five years?
The right process
Credit cards for immigrants with credit histories in their countries; gas delivery services for filling your tank while you’re at work; fresh home-made food with variety delivered to those who don’t have time to cook at home. All of these are ideas that come from asking such questions.
A systematic approach to the right questions is easy to achieve: use a logic tree that starts with a broad question (that spurs the imagination) and successively break it into narrower ones. The best questions are usually in level 5 or 6.
Brainstorming can work
A successful brainstorming session has constraints set up from the beginning, say the authors, such as whether ideas should be big or surefire, a monetary amount the company can spend, or how soon a payback is needed.
Don’t ask irrelevant questions, such as “for what usage is our product least suited?” when in your business your customers can only use your product in one way (ie. large cranes for industrial plants).
Use the right wording
The way you ask questions is different if you want radical ideas than if you want moderate ones. You should have prepared one question for each group of ~4 participants every 30 minutes. Ask yourself the questions, and as yourself which ones make you think the most.
Have people who can contibute
Make sure you have enough good participants in a brainstorming session; invite the people concerned with the answers to your questions, even if they are not in your staff.
Everyone must be engaged
Make sure everyone is giving their 100%, even if you have to have them bet about the outcome.
Beware social norms
Groups of four work well because the norm is to contribute equally; you can’t hide without appearing incompetent. Larger groups will be dominated by a few people, but if you break them up you can have more ideas produced simultaneously. Put all the pushy people in the same group, so they won’t dominate others.
Focus
Make sure the ground rules are clear; the boundaries will channel creativity. Give each group a very focused task, and have them spend 20-30 minutes discussing one question, and then report to everyone else the best ideas.
Reiterate
Have more than one brainstorming session, and set up a way of receiving data and feedback afterwards.
Narrow
Choose the ideas you will seriously consider first; people are demotivated if they think nothing will be done about the ideas. Sort things right there and then, and let the people whose ideas are not chosen learn about your thought process, so they can produce better ones next time.